How to redirect output of an already running process


Question

Normally I would start a command like

longcommand &;

I know you can redirect it by doing something like

longcommand > /dev/null;

for instance to get rid of the output or

longcommand 2>&1 > output.log

to capture output.

But I sometimes forget, and was wondering if there is a way to capture or redirect after the fact.

longcommand
ctrl-z
bg 2>&1 > /dev/null

or something like that so I can continue using the terminal without messages popping up on the terminal.

1
131
8/24/2009 6:43:23 PM

Accepted Answer

See Redirecting Output from a Running Process.

Firstly I run the command cat > foo1 in one session and test that data from stdin is copied to the file. Then in another session I redirect the output.

Firstly find the PID of the process:

$ ps aux | grep cat
rjc 6760 0.0 0.0 1580 376 pts/5 S+ 15:31 0:00 cat

Now check the file handles it has open:

$ ls -l /proc/6760/fd
total 3
lrwx—— 1 rjc rjc 64 Feb 27 15:32 0 -> /dev/pts/5
l-wx—— 1 rjc rjc 64 Feb 27 15:32 1 -> /tmp/foo1
lrwx—— 1 rjc rjc 64 Feb 27 15:32 2 -> /dev/pts/5

Now run GDB:

$ gdb -p 6760 /bin/cat
GNU gdb 6.4.90-debian

[license stuff snipped]

Attaching to program: /bin/cat, process 6760

[snip other stuff that's not interesting now]

(gdb) p close(1)
$1 = 0
(gdb) p creat("/tmp/foo3", 0600)
$2 = 1
(gdb) q
The program is running. Quit anyway (and detach it)? (y or n) y
Detaching from program: /bin/cat, process 6760

The p command in GDB will print the value of an expression, an expression can be a function to call, it can be a system call… So I execute a close() system call and pass file handle 1, then I execute a creat() system call to open a new file. The result of the creat() was 1 which means that it replaced the previous file handle. If I wanted to use the same file for stdout and stderr or if I wanted to replace a file handle with some other number then I would need to call the dup2() system call to achieve that result.

For this example I chose to use creat() instead of open() because there are fewer parameter. The C macros for the flags are not usable from GDB (it doesn’t use C headers) so I would have to read header files to discover this – it’s not that hard to do so but would take more time. Note that 0600 is the octal permission for the owner having read/write access and the group and others having no access. It would also work to use 0 for that parameter and run chmod on the file later on.

After that I verify the result:

ls -l /proc/6760/fd/
total 3
lrwx—— 1 rjc rjc 64 2008-02-27 15:32 0 -> /dev/pts/5
l-wx—— 1 rjc rjc 64 2008-02-27 15:32 1 -> /tmp/foo3 <====
lrwx—— 1 rjc rjc 64 2008-02-27 15:32 2 -> /dev/pts/5

Typing more data in to cat results in the file /tmp/foo3 being appended to.

If you want to close the original session you need to close all file handles for it, open a new device that can be the controlling tty, and then call setsid().

119
12/15/2016 12:56:17 PM

You can also do it using reredirect (https://github.com/jerome-pouiller/reredirect/).

Type

reredirect -m FILE PID

and outputs (standard and error) will be written in FILE.

reredirect README also explains how to restore original state of process, how to redirect to another command or to redirect only stdout or stderr.

reredirect also provide a script called relink that allows to redirect to current terminal:

relink PID
relink PID | grep usefull_content

(reredirect seems to have same features than Dupx described in another answer but, it does not depends on Gdb).


Licensed under: CC-BY-SA with attribution
Not affiliated with: Stack Overflow
Icon